This article tackles a highly debated topic in Egyptian arbitration circles – the “deemed internationalisation of institutional arbitration.” The article provides a succinct theoretical overview of the notion of “internationalisation” in a comparative context and offers an in-depth analysis and critique of the “actual” vs. “deemed” internationalisation under Egyptian Arbitration Law No. 27 of 1994. It also explains the relevant criteria under Article 3 of the Egyptian Arbitration Law and discusses the ramifications of characterising an arbitration as “international” as opposed to “domestic” in cases where the Egyptian Arbitration Law is the lex loci arbitri.
BCDR International Arbitration Review