In this paper I contend that the EU Acquired Rights Directive, as interpreted by the European Court of Justice, has adverse effects on the market for outsourcing services. The Court should change its position on the decisive importance of either taking over personnel or taking over intangible assets, since the emphasis on those two factors is ‘counterintuitive’ to the social partners. The resulting legal uncertainty leads to legislation that is not in keeping with general notions of market competition, as the British TUPE Draft Revised Regulations prove. Instead of focusing on the sector in which a transfer takes place, more emphasis should be placed on the economic context in which transfers take place, especially those resulting from a mere change of service provider.
International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations