Journal of International Arbitration

Volume 34 (2017)

Volume 34 (2017) / Issue 1

Ank Santens, Jaroslav Kudrna, 'The State of Play of Enforcement of Emergency Arbitrator Decisions' (2017) 34 Journal of International Arbitration, Issue 1, pp. 1–15

Abstract

The 2015 Queen Mary/White & Case International Arbitration Survey found that 79% of respondents considered the enforceability of emergency arbitrator decisions to be the most important factor influencing their choice between state courts and emergency arbitration when seeking urgent relief before the constitution of the arbitral tribunal. Given that the enforceability of emergency arbitrator decisions is a major concern for users of international arbitration, it is useful to explore the state of play of the enforcement of these decisions. This article provides an overview of all cases reported globally to date involving a request for enforcement of an emergency arbitrator decision and discusses key questions that arise in that context. The authors conclude by analysing the impact of the enforceability of emergency arbitrator decisions on whether users should seek emergency relief from an emergency arbitrator or a state court.

Copyright © 2017 Kluwer Law International
All rights reserved

ISSN: 0255-8106
ID: JOIA2017001